My Lords, I speak from the IT point of view. IP telephony was mentioned earlier as being difficult. I will not make any public comments on that, but a non-technical person might not realise that it would technically be possible to work out from what was presented in court where someone intercepted that communication from, because there are only certain points at which it could be intercepted. The very revelation that it was possible to get that information would then awaken one to what was going on behind the scenes. It is a technological process that lawyers would not realise was happening.
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Erroll
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1329 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:31:03 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277293
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277293
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277293