My Lords, the point is—and the noble Lord is not quite seeing it—that if another country does not mind risking its sources, that is fine. I do not see why he finds it such a paradox, however. We are talking about British intelligence and material, and there is not a lot of relevance in talking about using evidence from another country in a British court.
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1327 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:31:02 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277291
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277291
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277291