My Lords, perhaps I may answer the point since it involves me. The reason I did not refer to Sir Swinton Thomas’s views is the very reason which he explained to me this morning: that he did not want those views repeated in this House. That is exactly what my noble and learned friend has done.
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lloyd of Berwick
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1320Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:32:06 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277281
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277281
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277281