My Lords, I am not in a position to give a precise answer to that, but I recollect that recently there was a case where some form of intercept material was put into court and the judge decided that all the material, not simply the extract that was relevant, had to be transcribed and be part of the court’s evidence. I am merely postulating what might happen if the current restrictions were lifted. The words of the intercept commissioner should be listened to carefully, because he is also an eminent lawyer. We would open a Pandora’s box.
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1311 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 18:32:18 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277267
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277267
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277267