The noble Lord knows that he and I share that view, and I do not wear it around my neck. As I was about to say, the only real proof of identity is recognition. When I first came to your Lordships’ House, I was told that you could not get up and say ““the noble Lord opposite””; you had to use his name, even if you had to whisper to colleagues on the Back Benches to find out what it was. You had a duty to recognise him. All the staff in the Palace of Westminster used to recognise us. Not so long ago in this recognition game, Black Rod was kind enough to give me the numbers of all those working in the Palace so that when they said ““My Lord”” and were not sure who you were, you could look at the number on their sleeve, look down at your crib and say, ““Well, Mr X. how’s your wife?””, because ultimately recognition is important. Therefore, if we are talking about protecting British nationals, which we are, I would prefer that we used the word ““British”” rather than ““National””.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Selsdon
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 November 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1005-6 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 16:57:57 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276661
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276661
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276661