Commons Bill [HL]

The Minister has already clarified my two queries. In removing ““eligible”” the amendment opens the provision to corporate bodies, voluntary organisations or charities. Bodies such as the Ramblers’ Association and the Open Spaces Society, which may have a direct interest, spring to mind immediately. In spite of that, I am slightly concerned about the risk of frivolous or vexatious applications. I do not know whether the Government have considered that. It is a general relief that any person or organisation can make an application. Obviously it is easier if organisations do it because they have the financial backing that an individual may not have. In removing the term ““eligible””, allowing any person or organisation to apply, does the Minister not consider that cases will be brought that previously might have been considered frivolous or vexatious?