I rise only—because we obviously want to hear what my noble friend on the Front Bench will say about issues raised—to say that my submission would be that the points made by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lyell, will surely best be dealt with in discussions that I understand may well take place, because they relate to the Bill as unamended. In fact, we have passed the amendments and this debate will be prolonged too much if we discuss the Bill as if it had not been amended. I entirely agree with him that enormous problems would have arisen, which is why many of us wanted the offence on religious belief to be constricted to intention and real incitement.
As for the noble Viscount, his point is so important and is not made off the cuff—he has been trying to make it for a long time—that my noble friend on the Front Bench must have had adequate notice and it will be very valuable indeed to know what is the Government’s response in respect of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c1126 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:20:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269863
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269863
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269863