If the Government are going to agree with the noble Lord, Lord Clinton-Davis, then I suggest that we do not press the amendment. If they say, ““Yes, it is flawed””—which most people are saying it is—““We will take it away and introduce a lot of amendments more or less along these lines on Report””, then I think we should give the Government the chance to do that. If, however—I have a terrible feeling that this will be the alternative—they are going to dig their heels in like the shield wall at Thermopylae and say, ““They shall not pass”” (mixed metaphors and battles), then I think that we should press the amendment because, as my noble and learned friend Lord Lyell said, unless it is in the Bill, it cannot be made better on Report.
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Onslow
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c1090 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:20:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269823
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269823
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269823