It really will assist the due process of House procedure if we do not have ““dualogues”” during the debate. My noble friend chose his own words for his speech at the beginning of the debate. That allows one to say things first, but, unfortunately, it allows others to speak afterwards. I am not the Chief Whip; I am not seeking to curtail debate; I am not seeking to influence the content of debate. But noble Lords should be aware there is body language from other parts of the House that is expressing some concern.
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c1086-7 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:20:08 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269813
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269813
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269813