moved Amendment No. 37:"Page 5, line 25, leave out subsection (10)."
The noble Duke said: This is intended as a probing amendment. We were unable to recognise what is said on the apparent intention of this subsection. The Government have tabled an amendment that probably clarifies the meaning but we would be interested to hear from the Minister why the Government have tabled Amendment No. 27, relating to subsection (2), and how they feel it has an impact on subsection (10). I beg to move.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c310GCSession
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:03:25 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269716
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269716
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269716