I want to seek two points of clarification. My noble friend Lord Rotherwick is right that there is a real possibility that some of these commons may ultimately be under-grazed rather than over-grazed. If Natural England or the CCW acquired such rights, presumably it would be incumbent on them not to extinguish them but to hold them in perpetuity in case a time arose when they wished to exercise them to overcome a problem of under-grazing. My second point is that, if they acquire those rights, presumably that will enable them to become a member of a commons association. I can think of one or two commons in this country where, I know, they would not be very welcome.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Peel
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c304-5GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:24:38 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269694
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269694
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269694