I am grateful to the noble Duke for his comments. The question of whether the use of land is for agricultural purposes is important in deciding whether rights of common go with the dominant tenement. There will not be an answer in every single case, which is why we ask for the Secretary of State to make regulations to provide what is and is not to be regarded as the use of land for agricultural purposes.
I am advised that our amendment has nothing to do with Amendment No. 44, but what we feel may be unlikely to be eligible as non-agricultural use are potentially horse grazing, storing materials or land that is derelict.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
[Amendment No. 25 not moved]
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bach
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c295GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:47:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269665
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269665
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_269665