moved Amendment No. 100:"Page 73, line 31, leave out ““contains repeals, including repeals of spent enactments”” and insert ““makes provision for the repeal and revocation of enactments (including enactments which are spent)””"
The noble Lord said: My Lords, these are two consequential amendments recommended by the draftsman. Article 3(5) of the Regulatory Reform (National Health Service Charitable and Non-Charitable Trust Accounts and Audit) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/1074) amends subsection (3) of Section 46 of the Charities Act 1993. However, the whole of that subsection is to be substituted by paragraph 133(3) of Schedule 8 to the Bill. So we think that Schedule 9 to the Bill should include a consequential revocation of Article 3(5), to be achieved by Amendment No. 109. As Schedule 9 does not yet contain any revocations, we need also to amend the inducing words, as achieved by Amendment No. 100. I beg to move.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Schedule 8 [Minor and consequential amendments]:
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c721 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:15:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267665
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267665
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267665