I thank the hon. Gentleman for his generosity; I appreciate that he has been intervened on many times.
The reason why the Conservatives are encouraging the creation of this new officer’s post is that we think that people fear an increasing threat and problem with increasing air traffic, certainly at Heathrow and throughout the country. That is why we propose monitoring the number of flights. From my perspective in the Windsor constituency, I have been lobbied on many occasions, and quite vociferously over the weekend, because of the worry about the changes that we are debating and whether there is a backdoor route for more flights. If there is no intention to allow more flights or to abandon aircraft movement limits, why introduce these subtle changes, which seem to open that avenue? We are justified in arguing that, if the Bill is passed in its current form, there should be some monitoring of what actually happens.
Civil Aviation Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Adam Afriyie
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Civil Aviation Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c87 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:03:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266110
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266110
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266110