My Lords, where, under Clause 4, an individual is seeking the court’s ruling on whether their individual circumstances might give them a reason to not be sent to Rwanda, might that be because they are able to argue that “It may generally be safe but it is not safe for me”? Will they be able to argue that, because they are homosexual or ill, it is not safe for them?
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 January 2024.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
835 c1095 Session
2023-24Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-28 18:28:34 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-01-29/24012984000055
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-01-29/24012984000055
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-01-29/24012984000055