UK Parliament / Open data

Illegal Migration Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 July 2023. It occurred during Debate on bills on Illegal Migration Bill.

My Lords, I associate those of us on these Benches with the kind words of the Minister and others around the House in relation to the sad news about the noble and learned Lord, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood. He will be greatly missed.

Since Second Reading, we on these Benches have made clear our opposition to what we consider to be an illegal—to use the word of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile of Berriew—and immoral Bill. If there were any way in which a Bill of this kind might have any chance of stopping the boats, it was by acting as a deterrent. Despite its proposed retrospectivity, record numbers crossed the channel in June and again this weekend, as the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, said. The Government’s own impact assessment describes a consensus among academics that the Bill is unlikely to deter those seeking sanctuary in the UK. Both in theory and in practice, the Bill appears destined not to achieve what it sets out to do.

Instead, as introduced into this House, the Bill undermines both the UK’s international reputation and the global consensus that mass migration needs to be dealt with through international co-operation, not unilateral action. Unamended, the Bill is all pain and no gain, potentially creating a permanent underclass of tens of thousands of people who cannot be removed, whose claims for asylum will not even be examined, let alone accepted, and who will be unable to work legally—a permanent drain on the taxpayer.

Contrary to what the Minister has said, some noble Lords, whose attendance during our lengthy debates on the Bill has been—how can I put it?—sporadic, claim that no alternative has been offered. Nothing could be further from reality, as the official record shows. For example, some 15 years ago claims for asylum were higher; the backlog of claims awaiting decisions was a fraction of what it is today; and the number of those being removed was far greater. The only immigration crisis in the UK today is one created by the Home Office, and a Bill targeted at criminalising asylum seekers, rather than people smugglers, is bound to fail.

3.45 pm

It is customary at this stage of a Bill to thank those involved. I express my grateful thanks for the way in which Ministers and officials from the Ministry of Justice and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office have engaged positively with the issues surrounding the Bill. I thank all the NGOs and charities that have provided helpful briefings on the Bill. I acknowledge the hard work of Charles Goldie and his Bill team in difficult circumstances. I thank my amazing noble friends, the noble Lords on the Labour Benches, and Back-Benchers on both the Government and Cross Benches for their constructive engagement, whatever side of the arguments they have been on. Debate and dialogue are essential in such contentious areas. I want to reassure all noble Lords that we on these Benches have listened, and their views have been considered. Most of all, I thank Elizabeth Plummer in our Whips’ Office, whose work on the Bill has been heroic. Roll on, Wednesday.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

831 c1526 

Session

2022-23

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top