UK Parliament / Open data

Public Order Bill

Debate on bills on Tuesday, 28 March 2023, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Sharpe of Epsom. The answering member was Lord Coaker.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reason. Lords amendments 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E and 6F not insisted on and amendments 6H and 6J in lieu agreed to on division (246 to 201). Bill returned to the Commons with amendments.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

829 

Session

2022-23

Department

Home Office

Legislative stage

Commons amendments

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Public Order Bill 2022-23. Commons disagreement and reason.
Thursday, 23 March 2023
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Sharpe of Epsom | 829 c130 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

Lord Sharpe of Epsom | 829 cc130-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Public Order Bill is about giving the police the tools they need to tackle the high...


Show all contributions (24)
Lord Coaker | 829 cc132-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Sharpe, for his continued engagement over this difficult i...

Lord Sentamu | 829 c135 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I stand only to amplify what the noble Lord, Lord Coaker, has said. Anybody who reads t...

Baroness Chakrabarti | 829 cc135-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this Bill was always about political signals, not sensible policy. Finally, even signal...

Lord Sandhurst | 829 cc136-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not planned to speak, but it is important to remember that we are not dealing sim...

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb | 829 c137 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, what a pity the noble Lord does not care about what the Government are doing to the cou...

Bishop of Manchester | 829 c137 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I declare my interest as co-chair of the national police ethics committee, but obviousl...

Baroness Fox of Buckley | 829 c138 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Sandhurst, gave us a passionate reminder of the reason why there i...

Lord Hogan-Howe | 829 cc138-140 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, having been mentioned by both Front Benches, I thought I ought to speak for myself, jus...

Lord Morgan | 829 cc140-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not intended to intervene in this fascinating discussion, but I will make one poi...

Baroness Meacher | 829 c141 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I did not plan to speak and do not have notes to speak from, and I will speak briefly, ...

Baroness Butler-Sloss | 829 c141 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I say briefly that I am concerned about the use of these powers and I support the amend...

Lord Paddick | 829 cc141-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will not repeat what I said last time, but since last time, as the right reverend Pre...

Lord Hogan-Howe | 829 c142 (Link to this contribution)

I think I am entitled to my opinion and to make the point which I made. I explained that I could ...

Lord Paddick | 829 cc142-3 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is of course entitled to his opinion, and so am I. I said it was unfortunate that ...

Lord Dear | 829 c143 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had not intended to speak in this debate today, but I find myself totally in agreemen...

Lord Sharpe of Epsom | 829 cc143-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for another fruitful debate. As I said at the beginning, this B...

Lord Baker of Dorking | 829 c144 (Link to this contribution)

Would the Minister answer a question? In a situation where there is a protest preventing traffic,...

Lord Sharpe of Epsom | 829 c144 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we are debating stop and search. I am not quite sure where strip and search came into t...

Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall | 829 c144 (Link to this contribution)

With respect to the Minister, that was not an entirely adequate answer. He was probably quite cle...

Lord Sharpe of Epsom | 829 cc144-6 (Link to this contribution)

I apologise if I misunderstood my noble friend. I was basing my answer on the fact that a report ...

Lord Coaker | 829 cc146-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and also thank all noble Lords who have participa...

Back to top