I thank the Minister for his response to my amendment and I am pleased that he reaffirmed the Government’s ambition to phase in different species. The problem is that it is not actually in the Bill, so there is no guarantee that it will happen. I would also like to come back to him on this: the amendment is not designed to restrict. If scientific evidence supports this application, it will not restrict it. I thought I had made that clear. Also, if the Minister believes that the introduction of animals is likely to be later than the date in my amendment, I really do not understand the reluctance to accept this and have it in the Bill. On that note, I would like to test the opinion of the House on my Amendment 11.
Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hayman of Ullock
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 January 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
827 c241 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-01-26 14:18:50 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-01-25/23012590000014
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-01-25/23012590000014
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-01-25/23012590000014