UK Parliament / Open data

Public Order Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness O'Loan (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2022. It occurred during Debate on bills on Public Order Bill.

I will—I have very little to say. I ask noble Lords to bear with me; this is an important point. That clause is inconsistent with the common-law presumption of innocence and the protections under Article 6.

In conclusion, the Bill, while well intentioned, and probably reflecting a desire by the Government to try to show that they are strong, will deprive people of their historic and indeed ancient rights to protest. This is not what we as a country should be doing. We must not place an additional and unnecessary burden on our police. We need at this perilous time in the world to protect the rights of people to protest peacefully, and to utilise existing laws to deal with those who commit some of the many criminal offences which we have witnessed. We can do this, but the Bill is disproportionate in its effect and would be very damaging to those freedoms and constitutional rights which we have cherished as a people across the centuries.

7.08 pm

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

825 c184 

Session

2022-23

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top