My Lords, the only amendment that is going to be withdrawn is my rather small amendment in this group, Amendment 22. My noble friend said that we needed flexibility, and that good reasons were there to allow flexibility. I completely buy the need for flexibility in the procurement rules, but I still wonder whether good reasons without some other constraint around them are sufficient. I was pondering whether the good reasons need to be attached to value for money, or something similar. That may be covered by the interaction with Clause 11, which sets up procurement objectives, but I am probably too tired to work that out in my own mind at the moment. I will consider it further, and my noble friend the Minister, who also said he would consider it further, might like to reflect outside this Committee on how that works out. For this evening, I am sure that everyone will be mightily relieved if I beg leave to withdraw my amendment.
Procurement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Procurement Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c294GC Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-01 08:26:15 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-06/22070671000024
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-06/22070671000024
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-06/22070671000024