The Minister said earlier that the whole point of the Consumer Rights Act was about unsafe goods. I think that he means “unsafe” as referring to physical harm. Actually, a major security breach could render serious physical harm to someone because having all their money removed from their bank account could affect their mental state and result in the breakdown of their marriage, suicide, failure of business, all sorts of things. Therefore, it may have just as damaging physical effects on someone, though not immediately apparent. Although they are different they are equally unsafe, so this has more merit than he is suggesting.
Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Erroll
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 June 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c206 Session
2022-23Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-30 12:05:41 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-21/22062189000029
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-21/22062189000029
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-06-21/22062189000029