Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
823 cc171-198 Session
2022-23Legislative stage
Committee stageChamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberRelated items
Thursday, 26 May 2022
Bills
House of Lords
Tuesday, 21 June 2022
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Wednesday, 15 June 2022
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Moved by
Lord Fox
1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—
“General...
My Lords, I rise to move Amendment 1 in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Clement-Jones, w...
Show all contributions (35)
My Lords, I restate these Benches’ support for Part 1, which introduces a range of important powe...
My Lords, I want to say just a couple of words because, having read this and listened, I think th...
I am grateful to the noble Lord,
Lord Fox, and, in his absen...
I thank the Minister for giving way. That does not answer the question of where an app starts. If...
Perhaps, if the noble Lord is happy, we can explore this. The example he gives, as he knows, incl...
The Minister talked about standards a moment ago. If we are going to rely on standards, who is wr...
Some of the standards in this area have been set in the UK and have already been adopted by other...
My Lords, while that was a relatively disappointing response, I am pleased that we can have the d...
Moved by
Lord Bassam of Brighton
2: Clause 1, page 1, line 7, leave out “may” and ins...
My Lords, I am happy to move Amendment 2 in this group and will speak also to Amendment 4. I am g...
My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 3 and 5 and in support of the other two amendments in this g...
I am very grateful to noble Lords for setting out the cases for Amendments 2, 4 and 5. Since Janu...
Perhaps the Minister should consult whoever drew up the legislation that managed to mandate that ...
The noble Lord referred to mandatory minimum support periods for electronic display items and the...
I did not say that those requirements are applicable; I implied that they are analogous. Frankly,...
I do not think that they are quite analogous. As I say, it is about the requirement to keep the l...
My Lords, this has been a useful and interesting exchange.
In my lordly world, “may” and “m...
Moved by
Lord Fox
6: Clause 3, page 3, line 12, leave out “negative” and insert “affi...
My Lords, in his response to the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, talked about transparency...
My Lords, I am grateful, as ever, to the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee for its...
The feast of amendments in this group aim to implement the recommendations of your Lordships’ Del...
I sort of thank the Minister for his response, which is really no response at all. He did say tha...
Moved by
Lord Bassam of Brighton
7: Clause 7, page 5, line 24, at end insert—
“...
My Lords, Amendment 7 is also in the name of my noble friend Lady Merron. This amendment, as the ...
My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 8 in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Clement-Jone...
I am grateful to noble Lords for speaking to their amendments in this group, both of which seek t...
This has piqued my interest; how does this exercise relate to the Bill? This process of dealing w...
They are complementary; the new product security framework sits alongside existing legislation on...
I am sorry to keep popping up; being a practical person, I will try to give the Minister a scenar...
I will try answer the noble Lord’s question, and I am happy to write with further detail. Product...
My Lords, I would be grateful if my noble friend included me in his replies and letters. Is he aw...
I am happy to include my noble friend in the replies and the letter I send. This touches on work ...
My Lords, I am looking forward to the correspondence on this; I fancy that the noble Lord’s civil...