My Lords, fools rush in where angels fear to tread—I shall try to speak briefly. I welcome the fact that the Minister has been flexible and responded to points raised in the other House. Government Amendment 4 is a really good thing, but I have the same question: is this guidance or a mandatory process for the arbitrators? My understanding is that, if a tenant is able to reach a settlement through this process, that tenant no longer carries the stain of the unpaid element of the arbitration process. That therefore means that this would not stand against their credit rating and I wonder whether the Government have considered how this might not filter through into the credit rating system. As I am sure the Minister knows, the credit rating system tends to make life very difficult if you get on the wrong side of it. Some clarity on that would be really helpful.
Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Fox
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 February 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
818 c482GC Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-05 14:39:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000009
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000009
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000009