My Lords, far be it from me to delay any part of this important Bill, but I would like to be clear about the Minister’s insertion of “businesses or premises”. There does not necessarily seem to be a direct alignment between the two terms. For instance, is the closure of the business inescapably the product of a prohibition, as opposed to something that is advisory? I refer back to the great debate over whether something was guidance or mandatory. It seems to me that we could be looking at businesses with subsidiary operations and so on. If we are not careful, something that affects one part of a business but not the particular part we are talking about, namely the rent on particular premises, would not necessarily align. I would be grateful if the Minister could clarify what is intended there.
Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Lytton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 February 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
818 c482GC Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-05 14:39:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000008
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000008
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-10/22021095000008