My Lords, I also associate myself with and will support the regret amendment. I have not been able to be at the discussions on the Bill, but I followed them very closely in Hansard because it is an issue I am interested in. There is one point to note: the noble Lord, Lord Herbert of South Downs, made a brief reference to populism. I want to speak on behalf of the public, who might well support animal welfare, but I can tell you that if you talk to anybody outside this House and tell them what the Bill contains, they are equally appalled. The irony is that it is not fair for anyone to try to say that, as a consequence, the public might somehow get the blame for this badly formed, badly written, badly drafted, philosophically ridiculous and anti-human Bill. I do not think that is fair. Although I am sure all of us are concerned with animal welfare, the Bill is not about preserving the welfare of animals. It actually takes us into very dark, deep territory, and a bureaucratic nightmare. It is completely anti-democratic and the public would be appalled if they read the debates in Hansard in great detail.
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Fox of Buckley
(Non-affiliated)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 December 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
817 c22 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-12-23 15:30:24 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-13/21121317000054
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-13/21121317000054
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-13/21121317000054