I support my noble friend Lord Robathan. In anybody’s language, this is an extremely controversial Bill—that has come from a number of extremely distinguished Members of your Lordships’ House. The most appalling collateral damage could be caused by the Bill which no one has anticipated. That is the problem. When you have such Bills with a mind of their own and committees that can roar off doing all sorts of things and are completely independent, it is only later that you realise that it was a very great mistake in the beginning. In all modesty, I think the Minister should seriously consider this sunset clause so that we can reconsider whether the Act, as the Bill will no doubt become, has been a good idea, whether it has achieved what it set out to do, or whether it has caused so much damage that it needs to be radically revised. A sunset clause of five years gives us a wonderful opportunity to think again, and I sincerely hope that the Minister will give the amendment serious consideration.
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
816 c1757 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-12-23 15:30:03 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/2112072000029
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/2112072000029
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/2112072000029