My Lords, before my noble friend sits down, he has not explained why he argued so vigorously in Committee that, if the details that are now in the terms of reference appeared in the Bill, they might be subject to judicial review. His view must be that, because they are in the terms of reference, they are not subject to judicial review. In my view, they constitute an administrative act, so how is he going to get round this and avoid judicial reviews?
Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
816 c1704 Session
2021-22Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-08-22 10:39:55 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/21120651000028
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/21120651000028
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-12-06/21120651000028