My Lords, I have a lot of sympathy with the noble Earl, Lord Lytton. It seems that the 1996 Act covers these issues, and I am very suspicious of why HS2 needs such a significant change to the provisions of that Act for its project. I am not convinced that it needs these powers. I believe that, with modest alterations, good management should be able to overcome any problems. However, one faces the classic dilemma of a specialist area in an important Act, which is that I cannot know that I am right because we have not been able to listen to various points of view other than the expert knowledge of the noble Earl, Lord Lytton, and it is possible that the project needs these powers. As I understand it, there are likely to be few party walls in this phase of the project. He may be right that a dispute might significantly delay the project. Hence, I am unwilling at this stage to support the amendment if there is a Division.
Untitled Proceeding contribution
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Tunnicliffe
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 December 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills on High Speed Rail (West Midlands–Crewe) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
808 c1209 Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-30 09:53:51 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-08/201208103000069
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-08/201208103000069
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-12-08/201208103000069