My Lords, it is not the intention of the Labour Front Bench to oppose this order nor to rehearse the merits of the case. However, as a matter of principle, I would like the Minister to explain why he had to use the “made affirmative” procedure. When a two-year order is about to expire, the one thing you know is that you would have had two years’ notice of that. It is not clear why a perfectly normal order could not have been made. This procedure should be used only in emergency circumstances.
Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun Freezing Order 2020
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Tunnicliffe
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 February 2020.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun Freezing Order 2020.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
801 c14GC Session
2019-21Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-26 21:08:59 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-02-11/20021162000070
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-02-11/20021162000070
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-02-11/20021162000070