My Lords, I am so glad I did not have to write the content of this SI; it was hard enough trying to work one’s way through it when simply reading it. It is obviously the result of a combination of “Oops!” and communication with customers. I see absolutely no reason to oppose it. If anything, this underscores the complexity of trying to make arrangements for dealing with a no-deal scenario. I hope we never have to use it, because we would run into more “Oops!” if we ever found ourselves in that situation. I hope the Treasury is going ahead with a mapping exercise to try to link this all together, because how anybody who functions in the industry can ever work their way through all this is completely beyond me. Frankly, if you ever needed an argument for remaining, it seems that this alone provides it.
Financial Services (Miscellaneous) (Amendment) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Kramer
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 May 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Financial Services (Miscellaneous) (Amendment) (EU Exit) (No. 2) Regulations 2019.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
797 c1173 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-05-08 14:01:17 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-05-07/19050724000030
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-05-07/19050724000030
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-05-07/19050724000030