I apologise for interrupting my noble friend again, but there are two points here. The court proceeding he referred to was the Rangers case, which said that liability was with the employer. The point that my noble friend Lord Kerr was making was that this is treated as an emolument in one year, which means that the incidence of tax is higher because goes over the top rate. That is the point.
Making Tax Digital for VAT (Economic Affairs Committee Report)
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 April 2019.
It occurred during Debates on select committee report on Making Tax Digital for VAT (Economic Affairs Committee Report).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
797 c809 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-07-29 17:09:31 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-04-29/19042919000025
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-04-29/19042919000025
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-04-29/19042919000025