Can I take us back to the CAA’s 59 new employees? I am delighted to hear that progress has been made. However, it occurs to me—going back to what the noble Baroness said at the beginning of her response—that this SI is for a no-deal scenario, but the CAA has had to recruit for a no-deal scenario that might not happen. I am sure most of us very much hope that it will not happen. What will happen to these staff if there is a deal and good transition arrangements that allow us to continue as members of EASA and dovetailing in? I am not trying to have it both ways; I am not trying to say that they should not have been employed because they might not be needed. It just occurred to me that this is nugatory expenditure, but it might also have an impact on the permanence of people’s employment.
Aviation Safety (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Randerson
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 March 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Aviation Safety (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
796 c173GC Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-03-22 14:48:01 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-03-12/190312102000048
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-03-12/190312102000048
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-03-12/190312102000048