There is another point to consider. Essential to this is the definition of an emergency worker. Is it someone who is predetermined as an emergency worker? We have heard of the heroic efforts of ordinary engineers and ordinary people during the massive meltdown of the Japanese reactor, and we know that in Chernobyl heroic individuals took it upon themselves to be part of an emergency exercise. Although there is a definition of emergency workers in the SI, it is clear that, if there is an emergency—let us hope it never comes to pass—individuals will become de facto emergency workers by their proximity to what is happening. They perhaps are not covered by these regulations. In any case, how do you limit these people to 500 millisieverts when they are in the middle of an emergency? They do not necessarily have monitoring equipment to hand; they are dealing with an emergency. While this is a useful limit, no emergency is planned, so unless these people are already wearing the necessary monitoring equipment, they will not be monitoring the dose; and if they are accidental emergency workers—if you follow my drift—they will not have that monitoring equipment either. I would welcome the Minister’s response to those three points.
Carriage of Dangerous Goods (Amendment) Regulations 2019
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Fox
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 February 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Carriage of Dangerous Goods (Amendment) Regulations 2019.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
796 c10GC Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-03-14 17:05:43 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-26/190226147000061
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-26/190226147000061
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-26/190226147000061