UK Parliament / Open data

Nuclear Safeguards (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 22 January 2019, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Henley. The answering member was Lord Grantchester.
Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

795 cc654-662 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Nuclear Safeguards (EU Exit) Regulations
Thursday, 29 November 2018
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Nuclear Safeguards (Fissionable Material and Relevant International Agreements) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
Tuesday, 22 January 2019
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Henley | 795 cc654-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, these regulations set out the detailed legal framework for the United Kingdom’s new dom...

Lord Adonis | 795 cc656-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we are grateful to the Minister for his introductory remarks. This regulation was debat...


Show all contributions (18)
Lord Pannick | 795 c657 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, further to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, this is one of the reasons wh...

Baroness Altmann | 795 c657 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Lords, Lord Adonis and Lord Pannick, for restating the issue that I raised unde...

Lord Grantchester | 795 cc657-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, once again I thank the Minister for his introduction to and explanation of the regulati...

Lord Henley | 795 c659 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we move to a close on the statutory instruments that I have put before the House. I wil...

Lord Adonis | 795 c659 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister, who is helping the House a great deal. Have I understood correctly...

Lord Henley | 795 c660 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is possibly getting confused with safety and security, and thinking not only about...

Lord Pannick | 795 c660 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister said that it was “only” a matter of safeguards, but does he accept that safeguards a...

Lord Henley | 795 cc660-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall be increasingly careful about what words I use when I speak in front of disting...

Lord Adonis | 795 c661 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister has not addressed the point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, which is that we...

Lord Henley | 795 c661 (Link to this contribution)

I hope that the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, is not trying to frighten the horses; I am sure he would...

Lord Adonis | 795 c661 (Link to this contribution)

When will we reach this Euratom standard?

Lord Henley | 795 c661 (Link to this contribution)

I will write to the noble Lord about the precise moment, but we are moving towards that in terms ...

Lord Pannick | 795 c661 (Link to this contribution)

I am very surprised that the Minister is so reluctant to answer the question from the noble Lord,...

Lord Henley | 795 c662 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord, too, I suspect, is trying to frighten the horses. What I am saying is that we are...

Lord West of Spithead | 795 c662 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I apologise for not being here at the beginning of the debate. As I understand it, thes...

Lord Henley | 795 c662 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is absolutely right and he gave a very good definition for the layman. Given his e...

Back to top