The noble Lord is right about filibuster—I like filibusters on occasions. I could put down an amendment within the terms of the House of Lords Act 1999 so as to abolish the system of by-elections for hereditary peers and I could filibuster on a perfectly proper amendment which changes a word or whatever. That is allowable. However, as I know the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, is a constitutional expert, perhaps he can tell me how these amendments—which are clearly not within the terms of the title of the Bill—are allowable. I must have a word with the Clerk of the Parliaments—I am having a lot of words with him at the moment but I will have another one—to find out why on earth these things are allowed.
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) (Abolition of By-Elections) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 23 November 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) (Abolition of By-Elections) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
794 c71GC Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 14:57:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-23/18112316000047
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-23/18112316000047
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-11-23/18112316000047