My Lords, the Prime Minister said no deal is better than a bad deal, but now the NAO says the border and HMRC systems needed under WTO rules simply cannot be implemented in time. Business cannot prepare; the car industry warns about the catastrophic impact that no deal would have on its manufacture; ports would be jammed, even without Mr Grayling’s flotilla; and medicines would be in short supply—to say nothing of the urgent legislation required in this House. Is it not irresponsible, even reckless, to continue to threaten no deal? Having got to the cliff edge and looked over, should the Government not be saying, “Better not”?
Brexit: Preparedness for EU Exit
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 25 October 2018.
It occurred during Private notice question on Brexit: Preparedness for EU Exit.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c973 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-10-26 15:07:28 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-25/18102548000060
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-25/18102548000060
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-25/18102548000060