One obvious example is the issuing of a summons. Such persons issue about 2.5 million summonses at the instigation of public authorities each year. If every one of those applications for a summons was the subject of judicial reconsideration, with the kind of time limits alluded to in Amendments 8 and 11, the delays involved would be enormous. There are other means by which, in due course, a party may seek to challenge the issuance of such a summons. I take that as one clear example of where it would not be appropriate for there to be judicial reconsideration.
Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Keen of Elie
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 October 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c422 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-10-17 11:56:58 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-16/18101640000016
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-16/18101640000016
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-16/18101640000016