My Lords, to be frank, I wish that we could have just stayed in Euratom, which would be the simplest and most straightforward answer to nuclear safeguards, but I am relieved that the Government have listened to the concerns expressed on all sides of the House during the passage of the Bill, and I am very grateful that an amendment has been laid with which we can all agree. It is an important point that addresses any potential disaster, such as what if bilateral agreements were not in place, and avoids the cliff edge that we, like the Government, hope will never be reached. However, as the noble Lord opposite has just said, an insurance policy is a good thing and we now have that.
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 June 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
791 c1320 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-06-11 17:36:28 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-06-06/18060687000111
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-06-06/18060687000111
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-06-06/18060687000111