I am not really persuaded by the logic of the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Faulks. It is not as if all claims will be faced with a five-year period. If a case is brought two years before a review, the courts will be dealing with a more recent determination than if it had been five years. I do not see the advantage of the noble Lord’s proposition. There will be some cases that will obviously be closer to that date than others.
Civil Liability Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 May 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Civil Liability Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
791 c653 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-06-12 15:30:52 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000372
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000372
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000372