Can the Minister explain, then, what the point is of putting a subsection into a Bill that will have no effect, given that we know that psychological and physiotherapy services are under enormous strain and vary around the country? On the point he makes about people just adjusting how they make their claim, surely the answer would be, “We tried and it wasn’t available”. If it is to be a test, should it not be a test that is capable of being judged?
Civil Liability Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Primarolo
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 May 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Civil Liability Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
791 c277 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-06-06 12:46:02 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000166
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000166
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-10/18051059000166