UK Parliament / Open data

Nuclear Safeguards Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 March 2018. It occurred during Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that full response. He expressed deep sympathy with the intent of our amendments but, alas, even with divine inspiration, he failed to go a little further. Essentially, his argument in relation to my Amendment 7 was that it was unnecessary in the light of existing commitments in the Written Ministerial Statement and what he has said today about the importance of research and development. I go back to our debate last night on the EU (Withdrawal) Bill, in which there was an overwhelming sense that this country still has a lead in some aspects of nuclear research. The noble Lord, Lord Broers, spoke about that very

eloquently. This is at risk because of what is happening in relation to Brexit and our withdrawal from Euratom. It is important to have on the face of the Bill—in primary legislation—a commitment that the Government will report on research and development. I wish to test the opinion of the House.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

790 c220 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top