My noble friend has made a very good point, as has the noble Baroness. It is a question of what evidence would be needed to secure a conviction for the intention to dazzle. It seems to me that, taking the noble Baroness’s example of having a knife in one’s pocket, evidence that a laser is switched on is not hard to find. Evidence of intent to dazzle is very difficult. I hope that she can give some examples of the type of evidence that would be likely to be accepted in order to secure a conviction. If she cannot do so after she has had time to consider the matter, it may be that my noble friend’s amendment is the right one, and the paragraph should be thereby deleted.
Laser Misuse (Vehicles) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Berkeley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 27 February 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Laser Misuse (Vehicles) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
789 c603 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-03-14 11:02:25 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-27/18022748000152
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-27/18022748000152
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-27/18022748000152