I am sorry to interrupt the Minister’s debut on the Bill. I am trying to make clear that I am not asking the Government to stop proceeding with the Bill; all I am asking them to do is to set out on a piece of paper the nature of their future association and relationship. The Front Bench keeps avoiding that issue. I do not use the words “associate membership”, I use the word “association”. I am willing to change it to “relationship”. What I am trying to get the Government to do is set out how they see their relationship with Euratom—because they have acknowledged that they will have a relationship with it in some way—and what that relationship will cover. If we could get some clarity from Ministers on that, we would not be having these endless discussions about the issue.
Nuclear Safeguards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Warner
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 22 February 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Nuclear Safeguards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
789 c340 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-03-01 12:06:14 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000412
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000412
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-02-22/18022242000412