UK Parliament / Open data

Criminal Justice (European Investigation Order) Regulations 2017

Debates on delegated legislation on Wednesday, 6 December 2017, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Rosser. The answering member was Lord Young of Cookham.
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

787 cc90-104GC 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Criminal Justice (European Investigation Order) Regulations
Monday, 10 July 2017
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee fourth report.
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee fifth report.
Tuesday, 12 September 2017
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2017-0824
Tuesday, 19 December 2017
Deposited papers
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Rosser | 787 cc90-2GC (Link to this contribution)

The Criminal Justice (European Investigation Order) Regulations 2017 transpose an EU directive re...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 787 cc91-4GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not propose to deal with the post-Brexit situation, that is a land from whose bour...


Show all contributions (21)
Baroness Ludford | 787 c95GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I welcome this short debate. The European investigation order is a valuable instrument....

Baroness Ludford | 787 cc95-7GC (Link to this contribution)

I do not think that that is in the EAW framework decision, but it was much discussed in the Julia...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 cc97-8GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, for allowing us to have this debate ...

Lord Rosser | 787 c98GC (Link to this contribution)

The Minister referred a moment ago to “personal oversight by Ministers”. Can we have it quite cle...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 cc98-9GC (Link to this contribution)

Absolutely. As somebody who has been a Minister on and off for nearly 20 years, I am a fully-paid...

Lord Rosser | 787 c99GC (Link to this contribution)

How long would it take to go through this procedure?

7.15 pm

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 cc99-100GC (Link to this contribution)

I do not have the answer at my fingertips. Clearly, it would have to go through the judicial proc...

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 787 c100GC (Link to this contribution)

As I understood it—and the noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, referred to this—one of the weaknesses o...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 c100GC (Link to this contribution)

It goes back to what the EIO aims to do. Basically, it is a judicial co-operation mechanism for p...

Baroness Ludford | 787 cc100-1GC (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I might invite the Minister to agree that one thing that would help in the situation of b...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 c101GC (Link to this contribution)

I think I will respond to those remarks rather than accept them. The noble Baroness prefaced her ...

Lord Rosser | 787 c101GC (Link to this contribution)

I raised one question at the end of my remarks which I do not think the Minister has responded to...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 cc101-2GC (Link to this contribution)

I have in front of me the response given by the Minister to the committee—it was right at the end...

Lord Rosser | 787 c102GC (Link to this contribution)

The Minister accepts it on behalf of the Government as well as on behalf of the Home Office, I ta...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 c102GC (Link to this contribution)

I accept it in the context that I have just repeated it.

Lord Rosser | 787 c102GC (Link to this contribution)

I am not quite sure what answer I have had. I would have thought it fairly clear that if I asked ...

Lord Young of Cookham | 787 c102GC (Link to this contribution)

At the risk of bringing my ministerial career to a premature end, I can say yes. Of course the Go...

Lord Rosser | 787 cc102-3GC (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for his responses. I am sure that he would not say that he found himself in ...

Back to top