My Lords, I am afraid that this is Groundhog Day all over again. We have discussed these issues and I will not go into the economics, save to say that there is huge potential for very high insurance costs for multi-satellite constellation launches. In Committee, the Minister said that work was in hand and would be finalised within 12 months of the Bill receiving Royal Assent, so the amendment was not necessary. I feel that it is necessary because this is the make or break economically of the nano-constellation-style satellite. Without resolution of this issue, there will be no industry in this regard because it will be too expensive to launch these satellites in this country. For that reason, while the work is in hand—and I accept in good faith that it will be completed—we believe that the amendment should be agreed. I beg to move.
Space Industry Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Fox
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 November 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Space Industry Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
785 c1965 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-11-16 16:55:19 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-14/17111496000086
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-14/17111496000086
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-14/17111496000086