Following up the noble Lord’s point, I would like to say a couple of things. First, I sort of understand where the Information Commissioner’s Office is coming from. I have article 7 in my hands, which contains the definition of consent from the GDPR, and article 9(2)(a). My concern is that even if the Government are very nice to an Information Commissioner and persuade them to change the guidance, it could change at any time. It is important to ensure that the Bill will work for the ordinary man in the street. As for compulsory classes, it is not about looking after the insurers but every small business in Britain and every small person who wants to get motor insurance, especially those who have problems with either criminal convictions or their health.
Data Protection Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Kinnoull
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 November 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Data Protection Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
785 c1812 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-07 16:46:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-13/1711133000018
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-13/1711133000018
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-11-13/1711133000018