My Lords, a lot of the time when we talk about debt, it would appear that we are talking about people who may be in debt for a particular item or for a short period of time. These are people who are right down there and close to being in debt, and may be able to manage their finances by only a few pounds every week or month. So this is not just a debt problem overall; it is debt for very vulnerable people. If we do not help them and give them a bridging mechanism, we are creating a big social problem—a problem regarding their characters, the way they live, their friends and how they are seen. It is about much more than just how we keep the debt down and how, one day, they get out of it; it is about their social identity. Many of them have not been in debt before, and consider going into debt at all a crime and a slur on their character. When we have the chance, we must create the means to help protect as many of them as possible. Wherever we have a breathing space or gap whereby we can legislate to avoid them going permanently into debt—such as, dare I say it, in universal credit—we must try to do so. I therefore support the amendment.
Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Brookeborough
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 October 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
785 c1289 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-11-06 15:27:14 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-31/17103141000107
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-31/17103141000107
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-31/17103141000107