Space Industry Bill [HL]

I must confess that in looking at the roster of the amendments, I tried to work out what the main...

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, for reminding us of the importance that Prestwick Airpo...

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, for moving his

...

My Lords, I thank those who have spoken in this debate. I have mixed views about Prestwick: I hav...

Moved by

Lord McNally

37: Clause 36, page 26, line 18, after “misconduct” insert “or ...

It is always a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe. He is the reason why I do not...

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord McNally, for raising this important issue. This clause set...

My Lords, I notice a couple of noble and learned Lords in the Chamber today, and I would be inter...

Moved by

Lord Fox

38: After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause—

“Consul...

My Lords, in moving Amendment 38, we seek to insert a new clause after Clause 37 which sets up a ...

My Lords, this is an interesting point. I hope that the Minister will take it away and give it so...

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Willetts, who is not in his place, for his comments in Mon...

I thank the noble Baroness for her comprehensive answer, and I will be studying it closely in Han...

My Lords, I rise to speak to whether Clauses 38 and 40 should stand part of the Bill. The issue i...

My Lords, I feel strongly about these two clauses, because I recognise them. I have been a Minist...

Oh!

I beg my noble friend’s pardon. I hope that he is not laughing at that. First, the point I am try...

My Lords, I associate myself enthusiastically with the comments made by the noble Lords, Lord Deb...

Briefly, there seems to be an internal inconsistency around the frequency and the success of thes...

In the absence of the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, I would hate the opportunity to go past without ...

My Lords, I thank your Lordships for this short but sharp debate, which was so excellently introd...

I wonder whether, in further detail, the Minister could write to me explaining exactly what a “sm...

I will come on to explain that—but, of course, if the noble Baroness is not satisfied I will be v...

Let us say I own the land of which we talk and have had a negotiation with somebody who says, “I’...

There is a right to object to any order made and we hope these matters could be the subject of ne...

I am sorry, and I will not interrupt again, but with respect, this is not a balance. This is a pe...

As I said, there is a provision for an interested party to object to the order if it has been pro...

My Lords, of course I will not press my objection to the clauses standing part because that was n...

Moved by

Baroness Randerson

39: Clause 42, page 30, line 27, at end insert—

“( ...

My Lords, Amendment 39 is on a similar theme. It relates to Clause 42 and the operation of orders...

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 39 and the Motion that Clause 42 should stand part. The poin...

My Lords, I agree with some of the comments that have been made about the importance of dialogue ...

My Lords, before addressing the noble Baroness’s amendment, if the Committee will allow me, I wil...

The Minister referred to the 1982 Act and similar powers there. I will of course go away and inve...