It does not do anything of the sort. The Minister has told us that the Government agree with the sentiments in the amendment, but he has not said that they accept the amendment. That is what matters. The Minister does not need to worry about whether anybody reads Hansard tomorrow. If the Government accept the amendment, it will be in the Bill, and people will not have to read Hansard. I seriously do not know why the Government cannot simply accept that amendment or, at the very least, why the Minister cannot say that he will go away and study it and reflect upon it before Report, rather than excluding accepting it. It is, quite honestly, absurd. I ask the Minister to think very carefully before he sits down after this short debate.
Higher Education and Research Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hannay of Chiswick
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 January 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c1060 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-01-11 16:31:54 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013038000080
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013038000080
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013038000080