My Lords, I will begin by saying that I agree 100% with the principles behind many of the amendments in this group. It is absolutely right that Innovate UK should have as much autonomy as possible over all matters related to its remit and mission. We are fully agreed on that. However, I disagree with my noble friend Lady Neville-Jones. I fundamentally believe that Innovate UK will be better off within UKRI and that bringing together into one organisation research and the translation of research will create a much stronger one. I also feel that, when it comes to negotiating budgets with the Treasury and the like, again Innovate UK will be much better off within UKRI than if it were a separate body.
Higher Education and Research Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Prior of Brampton
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 January 2017.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
778 c1044 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-01-11 16:31:52 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013036000036
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013036000036
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-30/17013036000036